Epperson

Epperson v. Foreign Ministry Affairs

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20211:21-cv-00785California3,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHRIS EPPERSON, CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00785-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE v.

A CLAIM AND FAILURE TO COMPLY

12 FOREIGN MINISTRY AFFAIRS, et al., (Doc. 1) 13 Defendants. THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

ORDER STRIKING UNSIGNED

PLEADING FROM THE RECORD

(Doc. 5)

17 Chris Epperson (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on May 14, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On May 21, 2021, a screening order issued finding that Plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim and granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 4.) On June 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed an unsigned document titled “Amended Complaint.” (Doc. 5.) The undersigned strikes the unsigned document and further recommends this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.