Woodfill

(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20212:19-cv-02118California1,648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2: 19-cv-2118 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS D. WOODFILL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel and with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 38.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion be granted. Background On February 4, 2021, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to file an opposition to defendant’s motion within thirty days. (ECF No. 46.) On February 18, 2021, plaintiff filed an opposition, which was written in Spanish. (ECF No. 47.) On March 18, 2021, the undersigned again directed plaintiff to file an opposition in English, and granted plaintiff an additional twenty-one days in which to do so. (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiff was cautioned that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.