Harris

Harris v. LSP Products Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20212:18-cv-02973California10,611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIFFANY HARRIS, individually and on No. 2:18-cv-02973-TLN-KJN behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

LSP PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant LSP Products Group, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 68.) Plaintiff Tiffany Harris (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion. (ECF No. 73.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 77.) For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action arises from a purportedly defective product that caused damage to Plaintiff’s home. Defendant is a corporation that manufactures, markets, and sells “Aqua-Flo Mighty Flex” braided steel water supply lines (“Braided Lines”). (ECF No. 24 at 2.) Braided Lines are flexible tubing covered by tightly braided stainless-steel wires that connect the water supply line to common…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.