Maldonado
Maldonado v. City of Ripon
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO MALDONADO, No. 2:17-cv-00478-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF RIPON, EDWARD F.
ORMONDE, RICHARD FRANCIS,
RAUL HERNANDEZ, and ANTHONY
DEMARINIS,
16 Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Ripon (the “City”), Police Chief Edward F. Ormonde (“Ormonde”), Officer Richard Francis (“Francis”), Officer Raul Hernandez (“Hernandez”), and Officer Anthony Demarinis’s (“Demarinis”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiff Eduardo Maldonado (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition and Defendants replied. (ECF Nos. 35, 37.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 31.) /// 27 Plaintiff inadvertently refers to the SAC as the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (see generally ECF No. 29), but the document will be referred to herein as the SAC. 1…