Zuniga
(PC) Soria v. Zuniga
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVEN JOSEPH SORIA, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00635 NONE JLT ) Plaintiff, ) RAND WARNING TO PLAINTIFF; ORDER ) EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO FILE THE v. ) OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RAFAEL ZUNICA, et al., ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO AUGUST 24, 2021 ) Defendants. ) ORDER VACATING THE HEARING ON THE ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT )
The Court notes that the plaintiff has not been advised of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment, as required by Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988) and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998). Thus, PLAINTIFF STEVEN JOSEPH SORIA, PRO SE is advised1 of the following requirements for opposing the motion for summary judgment made by defendants pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 1. A motion for summary judgment brought under Rule 56 is a request for judgment on some or…