Crounse

(PC) Villery v. Crounse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20211:18-cv-01623California2,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:18-cv-01623-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO DETERMINE THE

SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT’S

D. CROUNSE, et al., ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO

REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

Defendants. (Doc. 55) 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff Jared Villery’s motion to determine the sufficiency of Defendant Guerrero’s answers and objections to his First Set of Requests for Admission. (Doc. 55.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. I. BACKGROUND This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims of retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, and of conspiracy to commit retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 56.) At the times relevant to this action, Plaintiff was incarcerated at California Correctional Institution (“CCI”) in Tehachapi, California. (Doc. 49 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.