Aryad

(PC) Howard v. Aryad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20212:20-cv-00081California601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY EUGENE HOWARD, No. 2:20-cv-0081 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DR. ARYAD, et al., Defendants. 16 17 A letter from plaintiff was docketed in this prisoner civil rights action on June 24, 2021. ECF No. 8. Based on its contents and timing, the court construes the letter as objections to the findings and recommendations issued on June 10, 2021, ECF No. 7, as well as a request for the appointment of counsel. The previous recommendation for dismissal was based on plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff’s objection letter states, in relevant part, that: (1) he is confused about the proceedings and his need to file an in forma pauperis application; (2) he would like counsel to be appointed to help him understand the proceeding; and (3) with the exception of one defendant, the instant action is identical to 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.