Unknown

(PC) Pavao v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20212:20-cv-01693California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENRICO PAVAO, No. 2:20-cv-01693-TLN-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a former county inmate currently in state custody, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 21, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and gave him the option of proceeding only on the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against unknown Sacramento County Sheriff’s officers 1 through 10 or of amending his complaint to fix the deficiencies with his remaining claims. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff notified the court of his intention to file a first amended complaint. ECF No. 20. Before the court could screen plaintiff’s first amended complaint, plaintiff filed two motions to amend the pending complaint. See ECF Nos. 25, 26. Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be given freely when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.