Covello

(HC) Munoz v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20212:21-cv-01138California240 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIAS IVAN MUNOZ, No. 2:21-cv-1138 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Los Angeles County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 499 n.15 (1973); 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis; and //// //// //// ] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.