Purnell

Purnell v. Hunt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20211:20-cv-01759California1,562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-01759-NONE-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DUE TO

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS

N. HUNT, CASE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDERS

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 9, 12).

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this civil-rights action by filing her complaint on December 11, 2020. (ECF No. 1). Because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and comply with the Court’s orders, the Court will recommend that this case be dismissed without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint on January 12, 2021, and found cognizable claims against Defendants N. Hunt, Luper, Garcia-Peralta and Carter for excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.