Munoz

Munoz v. Peterson Recovery Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20211:21-cv-01026California1,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS MUNOZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01026-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Doc. No. 2) PETERSON RECOVERY GROUP;

WESTERN RECOVERY; JOHN DOE 1; ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

JOHN DOE 2, CAUSE WHY THIS COURT HAS

JURISIDICTION, FILE AN AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT, OR VOLUNTARILY DISMISS

THE ACTION

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

19 Carlos Munoz initiated this action by filing a pro se civil complaint against Peterson Recovery Group and Western Recovery on June 29, 2021. (Doc. No. 1, Complaint). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2). Upon review of the motion, the Court finds Plaintiff’s declaration satisfies the requirements under § 1915(a)(1) and will grant the motion. Nonetheless, the Court will direct Plaintiff to Show Cause why this Court has jurisdiction and direct him to file an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.