Newsom

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20212:90-cv-00520California5,483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 17 As directed by the court, ECF Nos. 7112, 7143, the Special Master has filed a Report on the Continuous Quality Improvement Tool Key Indicators (“Report”). ECF No. 7151. Plaintiffs have timely responded to the Report, ECF No. 7195, and defendants have timely filed objections, ECF No. 7197. See ECF No. 7162 (setting timeframe for filing responses to Report). For the reasons explained below, the court adopts the Special Master’s recommendations to provisionally approve a preliminary list of CQIT indicators, to direct him to “test and monitor the functionality and efficacy of these preliminary CQIT indicators” during his Twenty-Ninth Monitoring Round, and to order him to report his findings in the Twenty-Ninth Round Monitoring Report. ECF No. 7151 at 21. The court modifies the provisionally approved list in 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.