(PC) Dumont v. CDCR Health Care Tracy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20212:18-cv-00101California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH E. DUMONT, No. 2:18-cv-00101-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR HEALTH CARE TRACY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Ralph E. Dumont (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.