(PC)Spencer

(PC)Spencer v. Beard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20211:19-cv-01615California2,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EDWARD B. SPENCER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01615-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

v. REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA

PAUPERIS STATUS

G. BEARD, et al.,

FOURTEEN DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants. (Doc. No. 19)

16 17 This matter was reassigned to the undersigned on November 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 25). Plaintiff Edward B. Spencer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on November 3, 2019. (Doc. No. 1). On November 20, 2019, the then assigned magistrate judge permitted Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 7). Pending is Defendants motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status filed September 4, 2020. (Doc. No. 19). Defendants claim that Plaintiff has accumulated at least three qualifying strikes and should have been prohibited him from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.