Arredondo

(PC) Falls v. Arredondo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20211:19-cv-00441California1,081 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID FALLS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00441-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO

v. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS AND DIRECTING

A. ARREDONDO, PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

EXPENSES SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

Defendant. (Doc. 43) 16 Defendant moves to compel Plaintiff’s responses to his First Set of Requests for Production of Documents, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(3)(B)(iv), and he requests reasonable expenses in bringing this motion. (Doc. 43.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion, and the time to do so has passed. See Local Rule 230(l). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion to compel and orders Plaintiff to show cause why an award of expenses should not be imposed. I. DISCUSSION A. Motion to Compel Production Parties may seek “discovery regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.