Frauenheim
(HC) Harris v. Frauenheim
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20211:19-cv-01203California516 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GERALD BRENT HARRIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01203-NONE-SAB-HC
Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
v. COUNSEL AND DENYING AS MOOT
PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO PROCEED
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Respondent. (ECF Nos. 30, 31)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO FILE TRAVERSE AS A SEPARATE
DOCUMENT
18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has moved for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 30, 31).1 As the Court previously authorized in forma pauperis status to Petitioner, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. With respect to Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel, there currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Chaney v. Lewis, 801…