Primm

(PC) Burgos v. Primm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20212:19-cv-01278California377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FRANCISCO BURGOS, No. 2:19-cv-1278 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. PRIMM, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 12, 2021, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint and determined that it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. ECF No. 7 at 5-6. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint, and he was directed to do so within thirty days. Id. at 7-8. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to amend the complaint in accord with the screening order would result in the dismissal of this action. Id. at 8. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor has he responded to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.