Schlichting

(PC) Moore v. Schlichting

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 6, 20211:20-cv-01672California1,312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARCUS MOORE, No. 1:20-cv-01672-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. No. 10) R. SCHLICHTING,

Defendant. 15 Plaintiff Marcus Moore is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his first amended complaint, plaintiff alleges a single claim under the Eighth Amendment for sexual harassment and assault, which includes allegations that a correctional officer grabbed plaintiff’s buttocks on one occasion and that the same female correctional officer, on a later occasion, touched her breasts and rubbed her body in a sexual way in view of plaintiff. (Doc. No. 8 at 3.) Plaintiff also alleges one claim of the violation of his due process rights, related to the same correctional officer named as a defendant in this action purportedly filing a false prison disciplinary report for indecent exposure against plaintiff and for claimed deficiencies in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.