Weiss

(PC) Banuelos v. Weiss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20212:19-cv-02370California749 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME BANUELOS, No. 2:19-cv-2370 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. WEISS, et al., Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendant acted in violation of his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file a response to defendant’s April 27, 2021 motion for summary judgment and that the motion be translated into Spanish. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff requests an additional ninety days to file his response to defendant’s motion. (Id. at 1.) In support of his motion he argues that he “is a layman to the law” and English is his second language. Plaintiff’s motion states that he is presently receiving assistance from two fellow inmates in responding to defendant’s summary judgment motion. One translates the material in defendant’s motion and the other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.