Wang
(PC) Salinas v. Wang
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON MICHAEL SALINAS, Case No. 1:19-00157-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT2
v. (Doc. No. 32) JEFFREY WANG, P. JOHNSON,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CORRECT
Defendants. MISSPELLING ON DOCKET 16 Pending before the Court is Defendants Wang, M.D. and P. Johnson, N.P.’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed January 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 32, “MSJ”). The MSJ contained a Rand3 warning and notice under Local Rule 260(a). (Doc. No. 32-1). Plaintiff did not file a timely response to the MSJ. (See docket). Considering Plaintiff’s pro se status, on March 18, 2021, the Court sua sponte again warned Plaintiff of the pending MSJ and afforded him thirty days to respond. (Doc. No. 33 at 5). On April 28, 2021, Defendants submitted a reply, urging the Court to consider the merits of the MSJ, despite Plaintiff’s repeated failure to respond. (Doc. No. 34).
1 Plaintiff identified nurse practioner “P. Jhonson” as a…