Munoz

(PC) Nino v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20211:20-cv-01722California3,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE NINO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01722-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO v. FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS

J. MUNOZ, et al., DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON

CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE Defendants. (Doc. 1) 15 21-DAY DEADLINE

Joe Nino alleges the defendants subjected him to retaliation and cruel and unusual punishment. (Doc. 1.) The Court finds that Plaintiff states cognizable claims against Defendants Munoz, Carillo, Harris, Masferrer, and an unnamed sergeant, but not against the remaining defendants. Therefore, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.