Bowman

(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Bowman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20212:19-cv-00806California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 19-cv-00806-JAM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT C. BOWMAN, LAURA

RIECH,STEVEN RAWSON,

15 Defendants.

17 On May 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 18 were served on the plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on May 28, 20 2021, and they were considered by the undersigned. 21 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which 22 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 23 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As 24 to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court 25 assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United 26 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.