(PS)Crane

(PS)Crane v. Juhasz

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20212:21-cv-00022California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JODI L. CRANE, No. 2:21-cv-00022-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF DUNSMUIR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jodi L. Crane (“Plaintiff”) is an individual proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 30, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 14 days. (ECF No. 33.) No timely objections have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.