Sullivan
(PC) Solorio v. Sullivan
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20211:19-cv-00688California800 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ADRIAN SOLORIO, 1:19-cv-00688-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY DEFENDANT SERGEANT
vs. GRATOKOSKI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT
SULLIVAN, et al., SERVICE (ECF No. 33.) Defendants.
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
21 I. BACKGROUND Adrian Solorio (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on October 8, 2020, against defendants I. Ottsman and V. Chavez on plaintiff’s medical claims under the Eighth Amendment, and against defendants Ottsman, Chavez, Clayton, Gratokoski, and Cardenas for use of excessive force under the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 24.) On June 8, 2021, the court issued an order directing service upon defendants Ottsman, Chavez, Clayton, Gratokoski, and Cardenas. …