Sullivan

(PC) Solorio v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20211:19-cv-00688California800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIAN SOLORIO, 1:19-cv-00688-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY DEFENDANT SERGEANT

vs. GRATOKOSKI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EFFECT

SULLIVAN, et al., SERVICE (ECF No. 33.) Defendants.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

21 I. BACKGROUND Adrian Solorio (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on October 8, 2020, against defendants I. Ottsman and V. Chavez on plaintiff’s medical claims under the Eighth Amendment, and against defendants Ottsman, Chavez, Clayton, Gratokoski, and Cardenas for use of excessive force under the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 24.) On June 8, 2021, the court issued an order directing service upon defendants Ottsman, Chavez, Clayton, Gratokoski, and Cardenas. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.