(PS) Murphy v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20212:21-cv-00141California311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR. No. 2:21-cv-00141-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy, Sr. (“Plaintiff”) is an individual proceeding pro se in the instant action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff has not filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). /// The Court has reviewed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.