(PC)Cannon

(PC)Cannon v. Gallahger

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20211:18-cv-00666California1,458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELVIN CANNON, Case No. 1:18-cv-666-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL AND TO MODIFY THE

v. SCHEDULING ORDER FNU GALLAGHER, ET AL., (Doc. No. 69) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of his deposition transcript and to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 69, “Motion”), filed May 14, 2021. (Doc. No. 69). Defendants filed a response opposing Plaintiff’s Motion. (Doc. No. 78, “Response”). Upon review, the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion in its entirety. I. BACKGROUND As background, Plaintiff Kelvin Cannon initiated this action as a prisoner by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 1). The former magistrate judge issued a Findings and Recommendation to the district court on March 29, 2019.1 (Doc. No. 9). The district court adopted the Findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.