Toor

(PC) McNeil v. Toor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20211:19-cv-01257California1,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MCNEIL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01257-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v. (Doc. No. 25) KIRAN TOOR, et al.,

Defendants.

17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel filed September 4, 2020. (Doc. No. 25). The Court previously ordered the parties to meet and confer to try to narrow the disputed discovery issues raised in Plaintiff’s motion and file a joint report. (Doc. No. 37). On February 24, 2021, the parties filed a joint statement advising the Court that the “discovery issues ha[d] been resolved” and Defendants would provide Plaintiff with the agreed discovery within 30 days. (Doc. No. 39). On April 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice with the Court advising that Defendants had failed to provide the agreed documents. (Doc. No. 40). After being directed to respond, Defendants advise that they sent the additional agreed discovery to Plaintiff on May 28, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.