Murphy Esq. Sr. v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20211:21-cv-00870California3,843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNON O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., doing Case No. 1:21-cv-00870-NONE-EPG business as SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

TAXPAYER ADVOCATE, OR

16 Defendant. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT

18 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy Esq. Sr. doing business as Sheetmetal & Associates (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on June 1, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint sets forth claims against the U.S. Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Advocate arising out of two phone calls that caused Plaintiff to panic. The Court finds that the Complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. After Plaintiff reviews this order, Plaintiff can decide to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.