(PC) Baker v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20212:19-cv-02617California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, No. 2:19-cv-2617-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. HOWARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On May 26, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied. ECF No. 35. The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Id. No party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge=s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.