Kirsch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLAN DAVID KRENITSKY, No. 2: 18-cv-0690 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. KIRSCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner represented by counsel. Before the court is plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and his motion for revocation of the appointment of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant plaintiff’s motions. This court previously set out the background for plaintiff’s motions. It will not be repeated in detail here. In summary, several months ago plaintiff’s counsel, Lawrance Bohm, informed the court that he had learned plaintiff was married after he instituted this action and that plaintiff’s spouse’s earnings may affect plaintiff’s status as an indigent under the IFP statute. This court then ordered plaintiff to file a renewed motion to proceed IFP. With respect to counsel’s appointment, both plaintiff and his attorney have provided the court with…