Lakes

Lakes v. Bath & Body Works, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20212:16-cv-02989California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL LAKES, No. 2:16-cv-02989-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC, Defendant. 16 In bringing the present Request for Reconsideration (ECF No. 175), Plaintiff Crystal Lakes (“Plaintiff”) asks this Court to reverse the Magistrate Judge’s July 29, 2020, Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order to Show Cause re Contempt and for Sanctions. ECF No. 163. Plaintiff’s Motion is premised on an argument that Defendant Bath & Body Works, LLC (“Defendant”) should be held in contempt for falsely representing that no documents evidencing a “silent recall” of three-wick candle existed. To support its argument, Plaintiff asks the Court to require Defendant to produce the deposition testimony obtained from a Bath & Body Works manager in another case which it believes will show that Defendant ordered a completely different candle to be removed from the market over flaring concerns. In the Order denying Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.