(PC) Reyes v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20211:20-cv-00023California5,644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE REYES, 1:20-cv-00023-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER,

PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,

VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR

VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF

Defendants. FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE

CLAUSE, AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF

CONFINEMENT; AGAINST DEFENDANTS

FISHER AND MOOSEBAUR FOR FAILURE TO

PROTECT PLAINTIFF FROM

CONTAMINATED FOODS; AND AGAINST

DEFENDANT MOOSEBAUR FOR

RETALIATION; AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS

22 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jose Reyes is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.