(PC) Reyes v. Valley State Prison
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20211:20-cv-00023California5,644 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSE REYES, 1:20-cv-00023-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER,
PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO,
VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR
VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF
Defendants. FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE
CLAUSE, AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF
CONFINEMENT; AGAINST DEFENDANTS
FISHER AND MOOSEBAUR FOR FAILURE TO
PROTECT PLAINTIFF FROM
CONTAMINATED FOODS; AND AGAINST
DEFENDANT MOOSEBAUR FOR
RETALIATION; AND THAT ALL OTHER
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS
22 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jose Reyes is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On…