Wren

Wren v. Thunder Valley Casino

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20211:21-cv-00901California2,751 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JEFFREY CHARLES WREN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00901-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED WITH v. PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND THUNDER VALLEY CASINO, et al., (ECF No. 5) Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

18 Plaintiff Jeffrey Charles Wren is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on June 7, 2021, and on July 2, 2021, filed his first amended complaint (FAC).1 (ECF No. 5). The Court has reviewed the FAC and concludes that this Court lacks jurisdiction over some of the claims, other claims are barred by judicial immunity, and any remaining claims are not cognizable. Because these deficiencies cannot be cured, it is recommended that leave to amend be denied.2 26 1 Plaintiff is advised that his first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.