Warden

(HC) Abraria v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20212:21-cv-01161California1,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY RALPH ABRARIA, No. 2: 21-cv-1161 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. For the reasons stated herein, petitioner is granted thirty days to inform the court whether he intends to proceed on his exhausted claim only or requests a stay of this action to exhaust additional claims. The petition raises five claims related to the 20 years 4 months sentence imposed on petitioner in 2019 following his probation violation. In claim one, petitioner alleges that “the record does not reflect the disposition of the remaining probation violations alleged in many petitions but apparently not admitted.” (ECF No. 1 at 6.) In claim two, petitioner alleges that he “did not forfeit his right to have the sentencing court exercise informed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.