Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20211:19-cv-01591California1,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE FROM

THE PARTIES REGARDING REQUEST

v. FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A SUBPOENA

DUCES TECUM

JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF No. 79) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum. (ECF No. 79). He seeks to obtain video recordings from court proceedings in his ongoing state criminal case in the Madera Superior Court, for which he faces felony charges.1 For the reasons given below, the Court lacks sufficient information to rule on the motion and will require the parties to file a response to this order. I. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff’s operative complaint is his second amended complaint, which alleges that 26 1 The Court may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.