CDCR
(PC) Jacobs v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV, No. 1:20-cv-00547-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
CDCR, et al., (Doc. Nos. 21, 23) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff George E. Jacobs, IV is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 14, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered a screening order concluding that plaintiff’s complaint, as filed, failed to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 18, and 29. (Doc. No. 11 at 24.) The magistrate judge granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint within thirty days to conform with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id.) Over the next eleven months, the following series of events took place, which prevented this case from moving forward. On…