(HC) Staich v. US Parole Commissioner
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IVAN VON STAICH, Case No. 1:21-cv-00628-HBK Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO
NOTIFY COURT WHY PETITION SHOULD
v. NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, FOURTEEN-DAY RESPONSE PERIOD Respondent. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
UPDATE PETITIONER’S ADDRESS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
SERVE ORDERS BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON
RESPONDENT
18 19 Petitioner Ivan Von Staich initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for writ of mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. (Doc. No. 1). On April 16, 2021, the Court ordered Respondent to respond to the petition and served a copy of this order electronically on the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California. See docket. Respondent has not yet responded to the petition. It appears Petitioner was arrested on a warrant for violating the terms of his federal parole and was temporarily…