Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Mountain Addiction, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING No. 2:20-cv-00945-TLN-KJN
AGENCY,
ORDER Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 MOUNTAIN ADDICTION LLC and JUSTIN SHEAF, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Strike or Dismiss the crossclaim filed by Defendants Mountain Addiction LLC and Justin Sheaf (collectively, “Defendants”) against third-party Defendant California Tahoe Conservancy (“CTC”). (ECF No. 10.) Defendants opposed the motion. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff replied. (ECF No. 14.) Also before the Court is CTC’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants filed an opposition. (ECF No. 22.) CTC filed a reply. (ECF No. 23.) For reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 10) and DENIES CTC’s motion (ECF No. 17) as moot. /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges Defendants own property adjacent to over 500 acres of land…