Tri-Dam

Tri-Dam v. Frazier

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20211:20-cv-00408California987 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRI-DAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-00408-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING DIRECTED TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

SCOTT FRAZIER, JURISDICTION

13 Defendant. (Doc. 23) _____________________________________/

15 On May 21, 2021, Defendant Scott Frazier filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff Tri-Dam filed an opposition brief on June 9, 2021. (Doc. 28.) Defendant filed his reply on June 16, 2021. (Doc. 29.) After reviewing the parties’ papers, the matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the Court vacated the hearing set for June 23, 2021. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the action pursuant to three statutes: (1) 28 U.S.C. § 1331, under which jurisdiction exists for “all civil actions arising under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.