(PS) Strojnik v. Sacramento Hotel, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20212:19-cv-02041California811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER STROJNIK, SR., No. 2:19-cv-2041-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. SANCTIONS ORDER SACRAMENTO HOTEL, LLC, Defendant.

17 On June 21, 2021, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why the court should not impose sanctions in the form of a $250 fine on plaintiff for failing to file a written response to the previously issued May 20, 2021 order to show cause. (ECF No. 17.) The time allotted for plaintiff to file a response has elapsed and plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, the court will order plaintiff to pay the $250 fine. Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this case and filed the complaint in this matter on October 11, 2019. At plaintiff’s request, the clerk’s office entered a default against defendant Sacramento Hotel on January 28, 2020. (ECF No. 6.) On November 12, 2020, the court ordered plaintiff to either proceed with a motion for default judgment or file a notice of dismissal of this action. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.