Williams v. Aetna Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:21-cv-00321-NONE-EPG (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART AND

v. DISMISSING DISMISS THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT

AETNA INC., et al., LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. (Doc. No. 6) 16 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on March 3, 2021 (Doc. No. 1), and the matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and found that it failed to state any claims but granted plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff then filed the first amended complaint (“FAC”) on April 9, 2021, listing nine causes of action against his former employer and supervisors: discrimination, harassment, retaliation, defamation,…