Pfeiffer

(PC) Jones v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20211:19-cv-00396California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYRELL WAYNE JONES, Case No. 1:19-cv-00396-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

CLARIFICATION AND MOTION FOR

v. ENLARGEMENT OF TIME J. WALINGA, ET. AL., (Doc. No. 65) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for clarification and supporting declaration of attorney Alice M. Segal. (Doc. Nos. 65, 65-1, “Motion”). The Motion seeks clarification of the Court’s June 25, 2021 Order (Doc. No. 62) and an enlargement of time to comply with the Court’s June 25, 2021 Order. (See generally Doc. No. 65). As background, the Court’s June 25 Order granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel. (Doc. No. 62 at 6-7). To the extent Plaintiff’s motion to compel was granted, the June 25 Order directed Defendants to produce “any reports or complaints lodged against defendants for misconduct in their capacity as correctional officers from the date they began working at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.