Milam

(PC) Evans v. Milam

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20211:20-cv-00070California1,763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD A. EVANS, Case No. 1:20-cv-70-AWI-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION1 R. MILAM, ET. AL. (Doc. No. 102) Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “motion for injunction CDCR to removal/dismissal of all disciplinary actions (June 2020-June 2021) for violations of the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,” filed June 7, 2021, construed as a motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 102, “Motion”). For the reasons below, the undersigned recommends Plaintiff’s Motion be denied. I. BACKGROUND & FACTS Plaintiff Richard A. Evans, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 14, 2020. (Doc. No 1). On April 6, 2020, the former magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.