(HC) Gianakos v. United States
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20211:21-cv-01056California180 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SEAN GIANAKOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC
Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND
RESPONDENT
v. [Doc. No. 6]
WARDEN WHITE, ORDER SUBSTITUTING WARDEN
WHITE AS RESPONDENT IN THIS
Respondent. MATTER
16 On July 6, 2021, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He named the United States of America as Respondent in this matter. On July 15, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name Warden White as Respondent in this matter. Warden White is the proper respondent as he is the warden at the petitioner’s institution and has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to amend the respondent is GRANTED. Warden White is hereby SUBSTITUTED as Respondent in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27 Dated: July 16, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .