(HC) Gianakos v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 16, 20211:21-cv-01056California180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SEAN GIANAKOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND

RESPONDENT

v. [Doc. No. 6]

WARDEN WHITE, ORDER SUBSTITUTING WARDEN

WHITE AS RESPONDENT IN THIS

Respondent. MATTER

16 On July 6, 2021, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He named the United States of America as Respondent in this matter. On July 15, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name Warden White as Respondent in this matter. Warden White is the proper respondent as he is the warden at the petitioner’s institution and has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to amend the respondent is GRANTED. Warden White is hereby SUBSTITUTED as Respondent in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 Dated: July 16, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.