Frauenheim

(HC) Alcantar v. Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20211:20-cv-01364California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JORGE ARMANDO ALCANTAR, Case No. 1:20-cv-01364-NONE-HBK Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DECLINING TO ISSUE

S. FRAUENHEIM, CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, AND

DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

Respondent. ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND CLOSE

CASE

16 (Doc. Nos. 1, 8) 17 18 Petitioner Jorge Armando Alcantar is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 9, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be dismissed because petitioner challenges solely the restitution fine aspect of his state court criminal judgment. (Doc. No. 8); see Bailey v. Hill, 599 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.