(HC) Sosa v. Corcoran State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20211:21-cv-01094California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFRED R. SOSA, Case No. 21-04329 EJD (PR) Petitioner,

ORDER OF TRANSER

v.

CORCORAN STATE PRISON,

Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a disciplinary proceeding that occurred while he was housed at California State Prison (CSP) – Sacramento, and resulted the loss of credits. Dkt. No. 5-1 at 35, 40. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction or sentencing. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). But if the petition challenges the manner in which a sentence is being executed, e.g., if it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.