Thompson
(HC) Wilson v. Thompson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNELL EUGENE WILSON, Jr., No. 2:21-cv-0793 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The application attacks a conviction and sentence imposed by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. On June 7, 2021, petitioner filed a motion to supplement the petition. (ECF No. 4.) However, Local Rule 220 requires that changed pleadings be complete without reference to any prior pleading. Accordingly, petitioner is granted leave to amend his petition to include all of his
“Unless prior approval to the contrary is obtained from the Court, every pleading to which an amendment or supplement is permitted as a matter of right or has been allowed 25 by court order shall be retyped and filed so that it is complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.…