McKinley

McKinley v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20211:21-cv-00754California1,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS MCKINLEY, II, et al., No. 1:21-cv-00754-NONE-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART AND

v. DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., (Doc. Nos. 2, 4) Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiffs Douglas McKinley, II, and Joanna McKinley filed the complaint commencing this action on May 10, 2021. (Doc. No. 1.) Along with the complaint, one of the plaintiffs filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 10, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. (Doc. No. 4.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiffs and contained notice that any objections to thereto were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.