Mastel

Mastel v. Miniclip SA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20212:21-cv-00124California8,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DEREK MASTEL, individually and No. 2:21-cv-00124 WBS KJN on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS

TO DISMISS

v. MINICLIP SA; APPLE INC., Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Derek Mastel brought this putative class action against defendants Miniclip SA (“Miniclip”) and Apple Inc. (“Apple”), claiming that they violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Cal. Penal Code § 631, and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, and invaded his privacy under the California Constitution via an app developed by Miniclip for use on Mastel’s iPhone. (See generally Compl. (Docket No. 1).) Mastel’s complaint also brings a claim under the Federal Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701, solely against Miniclip. (Compl. ¶ 62.) Defendants now move to dismiss plaintiff’s claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.