Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20211:16-cv-01066California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT

vs. DR. NGUYEN BE DISMISSED FROM THIS

CASE, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 110.) Defendants.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS

21 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment, and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.