Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20211:16-cv-01066California1,074 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
vs. DR. NGUYEN BE DISMISSED FROM THIS
CASE, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR
BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 110.) Defendants.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS
21 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment, and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) …